DEFRA unveils its new gamebird code
The long-awaited draft Code of Practice for the Welfare of Gamebirds Reared for Sporting Purposes was unveiled last week when DEFRA launched a public consultation on 24 November.
However, despite numerous stakeholder meetings and recommendations from the Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC), DEFRA has failed to reach a decision on whether or not to ban the use of raised laying cages for producing gamebird eggs in England.
The Government body plans to issue the finalised code in April 2010. Though the code is not legally binding, failure to abide by its requirements could be relied on to establish liability for an offence under the welfare provisions of the 2006 Animal Welfare Act. One of the most contentious areas of the code is the issue of raised laying cages. Rather than taking a definitive stance on whether or not to ban their use, DEFRA is now seeking public views on three options: (1) retaining the status quo; (2) requiring all raised units to be enriched and banning barren cages; or (3) banning cages altogether. The last option would include a ban on traditional partridge boxes.
Though the shooting industry has welcomed the code, key organisations are backing different options concerning raised laying cages. BASC is supporting option 3 but with the added proviso of keeping traditional partridge boxes. BASCs director of communications, Christopher Graffius, told Shooting Times that BASC has spoken out against the use of raised laying cages since 2005: It is important that everyone takes the opportunity to be rid of unacceptably confined cages. They tarnish the image of shooting and offer almost nothing in return. It is now time to demonstrate clearly that the shooting community will not tolerate this lowering of standards.
Mr Graffius added: The pursuit of cost-cutting over welfare by a minority must not be allowed to undermine gameshooting and the overwhelming majority of game rearers who use traditional pheasant laying pens.
The rest of this article appears in 2nd December issue of Shooting Times.
What is YOUR opinion?
Join other ST readers in our forums to discuss your views.
Like this article? Mark this page on a social bookmarking website…
